|

The CSA Homepage
The CSA - Who Are We?
The
CSA MySpace Blog
The
CSA MySpace Page
The
CSA Blog
The
CSA Public SMS Network
CSAnet Online Network
CSA New England
Weather
CSA National Weather
Connecticut
Survival Info
CSA
Radio Standards
CSA
PGP Tutorial
CSA
Defense Condition
CSA
Google Discussion Group


CSA Group History
CSA's Response to the ADL
Our response to the ADL's
Extremism in Connecticut Report
CSA's Response to Wesleyan
Our response to
Josh Nathan-Kazis
The
CSA Dar al-Harb
(House of War)
Girls of the Militia
Girls of La Raza
Islamic Girls Gone
WILD!
Stinger Sniper
Work on your hand/eye
coordination
Tactical Assassin 2
Work on your hand/eye
coordination
Sniper Assassin II
Work on your hand/eye
coordination
Save the
Witness
Work on your hand/eye
coordination
CSA Online Store
Get your Official CSA Merchandise






|
|
CSA
RESPONSE TO KAZIS THE NAZI! |
|
|
Beyond the Blue Lights:
Heavily armed hackers

By Josh Nathan-Kazis
the Nazi
With Corrective
Commentary by CTsurvivalist
|
| |
| Last week, a series of
late-night web searches led me
to a directory of
militia groups. As is my habit, I scrolled through
to see if any might be located near Middletown.
Clicking, following a promising-looking link, I
found myself at the homepage of the Connecticut
Survivalist Alliance. As
usual another apparently bored with his life liberal
with nothing better to do but search out those "dangerous
extremists"
The group's low-tech, mid-nineties-style website
features a row of animated gifs of running army men
set against a blue and white sky-themed background,
flanked by fluttering Connecticut flags. At the top
of the page is a grainy image of the group's
standard – a Confederate flag superimposed with the
seal of the state of Connecticut.
Well, considering the page
was last updated in 2001, that might explain a few
things. We must have a target we didn't know about
painted on our foreheads. Why is it that want-to-be
liberal journalists feel they must attack something
they know nothing about and instantly fear.
Considering the fact that we don't try to bleed
individuals for their hard earned money, we make due
with what we have.
The site is packed with what it calls "Survival
Information" - graphics showing the radius of
destruction in the event that any of fourteen
Connecticut sites are hit by nuclear blasts, storm
information, a list of ham radio standards, and a
page declaring the current CSA DEFCON to be set at
2, requiring members to be in "daily contact with
cell leaders."
An explanatory note declares that, "No one word
can describe the CSA or what we are. We are a little
bit Militia because we are loosely organized and
heavily armed. We are a little bit Survivalist
because we are ready to defend our beliefs and help
others in time [sic] of need. We are a little bit
Libertarian because of our strongly held beliefs
that every American should accept personal
responsibility for what they do."
Another page on the website seems to claim that the
group has a presence in Middlefield, Connecticut, at
#222 on Route 66. Feeling a bit gutsy, I decided to
pay them a visit.
Did you attempt to e-mail
us? NO! What would possess someone to try and "pay
us a visit"? How would you like it if someone you
had absolutely no idea who they are knocked on your
door and "paid you a visit". We have family and
young children, you would have gotten a few choice
adjectives and had a door slammed in your face.
In a
worst case scenario, we would have you arrested for
trespassing.
The Anti-Defamation League makes a passing reference
to the CSA in a 2001 report entitled "Extremism in
Connecticut." The report classifies the group under
the general rubric of "Militia Groups and
Paramilitary Organizations," which it characterizes
as "an anti-government movement heavily imbued with
conspiracy theories, many of which center around
firearms." These groups, according to the report,
frequently "believe that the U.S. government
collaborates with various inimical forces to create
a 'New World Order'— a socialist, authoritarian,
one-world government."
The CSA seems to barely rate a mention in the
report. It says that "there is little evidence that
the CSA has a real world presence that extends
beyond its Internet activities."
Instead, the ADL believes that the website is simply
a clearinghouse for survivalist tactics and militia
information.
We are a clearing house for
information to the "Patriot" movement. It's
intolerant liberal social deviants like yourself
that like stirring up trouble just for the fun of
doing it that are the threat. You'll have a nice job
waiting for you at the ADL.
Of its leadership, the report says that the
group's leader is Thomas Icom, "previously most
noteworthy for having edited for many years the
newsletter Cybertek, aimed at survivalists and
computer hackers."
The CSA's website has a page dedicated to refuting
the ADL's claims. It insists that the group has a
real world presence, saying, "You just keep on
thinking that we don't exist in the 'real world' and
when the proverbial shit hits the fan you can all
just crawl under your beds and die and leave the
'real world' to us."
As for Thomas Icom, the page denies that he is the
group's founder, saying, "Thomas Icom is not the
leader of the CSA. He's flattered by your misguided
supposition, but he is just a member." Instead, the
page reports that the group's founder is
ctsurvivalist, "a strange and mysterious
individual."
Indeed, most of the CSA website's pages are signed
by ctsurvivalist, and he has posted most of the
messages on the website's recently-opened message
board.
As we've stated before,
Thomas Icom is NOT the leader of the CSA. Had you bothered
e-mailing anyone you would have known this. That's
the biggest problem with so called "journalists",
they want to make up the facts as they see fit and
not bother doing any research.
Still, there is undoubtedly a connection between the
CSA and the hacker community. The CSA's website is
located within the webpage of the International
Information Retrieval Guild, a Connecticut-based
hacker group.
This overlap between hacking and survivalism is
counterintuitive. The popular imagination associates
hackers with teenage nerds like Matthew Broderick's
character from 1983's "WarGames." Meanwhile,
survivalists are associated with the Unabomber and
other violent paranoid loners living off the grid in
remote areas of the Pacific Northwest.
Being a "survivalist" does not make you a
extremist. Every-single-day, we wake up and, on top
of our daily "real life routines", think about ways we
can better protect ourselves and our loved ones.
We
try to inspire others to find ways to better protect
themselves and their loved ones, and to share that
information with the rest of the CSA.
It gets old dealing with small minded deviants like
you that like stirring up trouble and spewing
hatred and intolerance, or spreading lies and
rumors.
An article entitled "What is CYBERTEK?," credited to
Thomas Icom and posted at various locations online,
gives some insight into where the two interests
intersect. Icom writes, "CYBERTEK is a bimonthly
newsletter for those whose desire is to maximize
their freedom and be able to function as free
citizens in a society which discourages and works
against those desiring liberty."
Both hackers and survivalists see themselves in
opposition to authority in general, and the
government in particular. In order to protect
various freedoms, both believe they have the
authority to arm themselves – hackers with computer
programs, survivalists with guns. For hackers like
Icom, survivalism becomes an analog extension of the
paranoid hacker mentality.
I would love for you to meet Mercenary of the
IIRG.
He's not so forgiving as us. In fact the last person
who tried to feed him a line of bullshit like that
almost looks normal after the plastic surgery.
But hackers and
survivalists have many common interests. We both
believe in privacy, encryption, covert
communications, communications monitoring and we all
hate journalists. Our
webpage is on the IIRG's webpage because they are
the one group of individuals with the balls enough
to host our webpage.
In preparation for my visit to what I imagined would
be the CSA's bunker, I made a phone call to the
office of Middlefield's Resident State Trooper.
After a few tries, I finally got through to a patrol
officer, who said that he had never heard of the
group. When I asked if he knew what was located at
#222 Rt. 66, he thought for a moment. "That must be
the Red Dog," he said.
The Red Dog? Middlefield's infamous biker bar?
I looked back at the CSA's website to where I had
first seen the address. It was on the page
responding to the ADL's report.
"We do…have a presence in Middlefield," it read.
"All ADL members, please feel free to drop by any
time you like. We are located at #222 on Route 66 in
Middlefield, CT. We would especially like it if all
you scantily clad female ADL members dropped in. We
think you'll find everyone warm and hospitable."
Ha. Ha. Ha.
We can't believe
that some idiot fell for that one. Every single
person we know, knew that was a joke directed at the
ADL . Maybe in the future you'll learn to e-mail
individuals you're attempting to write about. We
probably would have been there having a beer anyway.
Facta Non Verba - DEEDS, Not
words. We try to live by that simple code.
I know
all our supporters believe in those words also.
I think this writer should
learn to contribute to the SOLUTION, not add to the
problem.
CTsurvivalist
10/14/06

Link to
Josh Nathan-Kazis "The Nazi's" Article

|
| |


|
|

The
CSA
does not ask individuals for money out of their
pockets,
but we do ask you for your support in our efforts.
Register here and make $6.00 and by supporting us
we make $1.25
Use a
Fake Name if you have privacy issues.
Thanks to your generous support,
we are able to add new features to the
system.
Keep up the support!
Register on every IP you can!
Homeland Security Advisory



"If the freedom of speech is taken
away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
- George Washington

Meet "Lonely Jihadist Wives"
HERE!








|